Archive for May, 2011

Thank You for (Not) Drinking

Thank You for (Not) Drinking

russian poster no drinking Thank You for (Not) Drinking Everyone thought that I gave up alcohol for lent. Because it was what i told them. It was, after all, the most convenient thing to say, instead of going into a long-winded explanation of the circumstances leading up to the six-week abstinence. In truth, I hadn’t the slightest clue as to when lent actually began or ended, so it took some haphazard guessing that I was still within that forty day range when asked why I wasn’t drinking.

Over that time period, it was surprising the amount of things that transgressed. The first of which being that Wellness thought it would be a good idea to call me in when I sent an email to the Goody Goody working at the university detailing the dark humour of my stint in the mental ward. To clarify, being that Goody Goody’s name precedes them, the email was forwarded to Wellness with a tinge of concern, despite the tone in which I wrote it. In any case, Wellness’ Crisis Jane thought it would be a great idea to dissect what I had written on a primary level, failing to see the second degree humour of it all, and instead asking if it was some kind of cry for help, especially since I wrote in third person with first-grader English.

There was not much else for me to do but to dismiss what they were asserting about me; after all, who were they to try and analyze me only after meeting me through my file. Following my straight faced replies, Crisis Jane thought it would be a good idea to “warn” me that pulling any more “stunts” like the aforementioned would lead to the Student Health Center to slap a “no” on my study abroad application, since they’d have to be consulted.

What they didn’t mention was the actual truth: the delay on my study abroad application was put on hold because of Steinhardt’s hesitancy to let me go for an entire year with few courses contributing to my MCC degree. The health center, in actuality, had not been consulted as the little birds have told me.

It was more than five weeks in when I was in Toronto visiting when I found myself at The Football Factory with some company, some with whom I was familiar and some not so much. It wasn’t so much that I was dying of first of a beer, but rather, deciding to have a drink as opposed to digress into the lent excuse with strangers. The point of the whole six-week abstinence, as many would come to agree with me when I told this story, was to demonstrate that I had self-discipline to abstain from alcohol, as well as to follow after with responsible drinking. In the grand scheme of things, it being not exactly six weeks just didn’t seem to matter to me.

shrink lid Thank You for (Not) Drinking

Maybe I should opt for this instead - it is super portable

It was shortly after this that I met with The Intern for our last meeting. Generally, the last meeting at Counseling and Behavioral Health is meant for referrals to other therapists outside of NYU and as a general follow-up. Since I’ve had the “pleasure” (it could be assumed in both sarcasm and genuineness) of bonding with the many folks at the center, that duty of referring me out could and was delegated to the others that I was seeing, including the PhD.

Anyway, our last session had no particular theme or topic on which it concentrated; it was instead much like how my sessions with The Shrink turned out – conversation about whatever. Partially serious and partially joking, I asked if we could be friends. At first, the Intern evaded the question by directing the conversation elsewhere, but when I kept bringing it back, the Intern finally answered with a “no.” There are numerous reasons as to why one cannot be friends with their therapist afterward, the major one being about context and situation. In retrospect, I merely asked the question so as continue walking along that fine line and pushing boundaries as I had always done just to see if I could. But I did ask the question so as to confirm what I had suspected – the Intern surely deserved that MSW and wasn’t doing things strictly by-the-book blindly but understood and made the choice to do so.

And so followed perhaps one of the moments in which an idea was never so succinct, in spite of others having told me before. It didn’t matter if it may seem trivial, but the issues I faced were traumas, and it didn’t quite matter if it did or didn’t match up to others’. If something had an effect on me, then that was all that mattered. Perhaps it was just how the Intern articulated the aforementioned, or simply the context of it being the “end” of something, but I realized I shouldn’t have to compare what I’ve experienced to others as a means of gauging whether or not to dismiss or address the pain.

Coming back to “lent,” I met with the Cat Lady several weeks after my last session with the Intern. It turned out that the measure of time, which had not mattered tome, had in fact mattered to the Cat Lady when I told her. She told me that I had failed, and that I had to start again the six-week alcohol ban. Apparently, we didn’t to seem the share thoughts on the exercise being one of self-discipline and self-regulation. It was perhaps with that instance that I began questioning things up front as opposed to following someone with a degree, in belief that they had my best interests at heart. I refused to engage again in this exercise, stating that I had already demonstrated to myself according to what I felt the point of the alcohol ban to be. It is tiresome to think of was to worm yourself out of drinking when you are doing so not because you want to, but because someone doesn’t believe you when you say you do not have a problem. At this point, much of what I have told had been a secret; in which case meant that I was quite dodgy and evasive with questions and speculation. In other words, I was constantly uncomfortable, and unnecessarily adding to it was not something that I wanted.

do not call Thank You for (Not) Drinking

Perhaps this should be Wellness' new motto and poster

The real kicker of it all was when I had actually called Wellness feeling an overwhelming despair. I’m not one to talk about my feelings or emotions, especially over the phone, so the call was rather curt and quick on my end. The next day’s follow-up was met again with Crisis Jane (I do believe, but I’m not completely sure) and my flat responses, and general refusal as to what had transpired in my mind the evening before. After all, it is rather difficult to talk to a stranger, knowing that there is nothing they can do in terms of time spent or advice. But the reply by Wellness to my want to leave was, “if you don’t want to be here, don’t call us.”

Image courtesy of The Xacan Connection and flickr.com (users: even-star and junkstock)

May 25, 2011
The Aftermath

The Aftermath

zoloft chug montine The Aftermath

I was instructed by the folks at the hospital to check in with Wellness within the week, or I would be pulled from school. And so I did stop by to explain the misunderstanding that had taken place some evenings before, but it seemed as though that there was no interest or validity in what I had to say, as though I had concocted the series of events. Perhaps it was because of the amount of time that I’ve spent at the student health center (after all, there are so many more in need of help), but it was decided there that my SAFE evaluation for this incident would be dealt with anywhere but here.

And that was that. I was somehow left to fall between the proverbial cracks with no one seeming to pay much attention as to what had transgressed. Sifting through old emailed appointment reminders, it would look as though my appointment with The PhD was scheduled in light of my recent trip to Bellevue, but that wasn’t the case – it was simply coincidental. In retrospect, though, I’m not quite sure what I should have expected as an outcome of being locked up, with regards to my interaction with the health center. All of which being a rather difficult field to traverse given scheduling and availability; however, the feeling of being left stranded (re: dropping the second SAFE evaluation) and subsequent reaction of the Cat Lady were certainly not expected.

It was almost two weeks later when I sat down in the Cat Lady’s office. I went on to explain the story of how I found myself spending ten or so hours at Bellevue, as I had outlined here and here. The response to what I had told her was anything but favourable. The Cat Lady took an opposing stance, explicitly stating that everything that had happened was my fault and no one else – there was no misunderstandings or anything of the sort. I tried to contest, but I was quick to realize that the argument would go nowhere. To add, the Cat Lady, who had somehow convinced herself over the weeks that the root of all my problems was my drinking, proposed an ultimatum for me – I either attend several meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous (quite tangential there) or go six weeks without a drink. Quite frankly, it’s difficult to go to meetings when you don’t have an addiction to alcohol, so I could only opt for the latter choice. And of course, the usual banter about the somnolence resulting for the Lexapro was entertained with little done about it.

The following week I found myself receiving a reminder via email for an appointment with the Intern that I had not scheduled. Believing it was an error, I called the health center so as to cancel my appointment. After all, I only really had one more session with the Intern (each student is allotted ten sessions per academic year for short term counseling). Several days after, at around noontime, I logged onto my computer to find a message from the Intern detailing that the following session would not be counted for hours:

Hi Barbara,

I just wanted to reach out to you and see how you are doing. I have noticed that you canceled the last session scheduled with me. I would like to see you next week, if that is possible. I know that a cocnern was the number of sessions and at this time, I would like to follow up with you and it does not need to be our last session. I will ask the staff to schedule you for next Saturday and I hope that you will be able to make it. If you can not make it at that time, they can also work with you to find a better time that works for you.

Have a great day,
Intern

It’s funny, I hadn’t expected that anyone would be checking up on or reaching out to me, especially after my experiences with Wellness, Cat Lady, and the Specialist. But since the message was sent and received through the clunky “secure messages” system, I had trouble explaining what I had thought to be a mistake. The Intern could only send me a message, but I couldn’t reply since the Intern was not an official member of the health center. And so if memory serves me correctly, when Saturday morning rolled on by, I hurried out the door to 726 Broadway so as to clear up the misunderstanding in person before booking an appointment. The student worker, who was the Saturday third-floor receptionist, had probably thought that I had lost my bearings in asking that I wanted to have a quick chat with the Intern. After double checking with the Intern via phone, I was told to weave through the halls to meet with the Intern.

In the style of yours truly, I greeted the Intern by immediately commenting with intent and reasoning, “I wasn’t ignoring you, the secure messaging system is only for the official people, and you’re not one of them.” Perhaps it was because the setting wasn’t formal or that my statement really was that funny at the moment, but the Intern simply burst out in genuine laughter. I proceeded to quickly explain the circumstances leading up to and series of events at the mental ward, with characters and all. And with that, I felt for the first time since being locked up at Bellevue that I could be believed and not feel judged/dismissed at the health center.

Image courtesy of flickr.com (user: montine)

May 21, 2011
A Note on NYU in France

A Note on NYU in France

nyu france main building A Note on NYU in France

The main building of NYU in France

On a bright Sunday afternoon, I punched in the code to enter through the blue doors at 56 rue de Passy, and quietly pushed open the gate separating the main NYU in France building from the rest of the empty courtyard. The mission was simple – to snap up some shots of the campus without people thinking that I was just getting around to writing just another “goodbye and I had fun at study abroad” post, because that certainly isn’t the intent of this entry.

I’ve spent a total of five semesters studying abroad at this campus – fall 2008, spring 2009, summer 2009, fall 2010, and spring 2011 – and in that time, I’ve watched the program not only develop to meet the number of non-French majors wanting to participate in the study abroad program (at NYU in France), but also encountered some of the the most passionate and down-to-earth professors and staff.

Notably, in a previous entry, I talked briefly about the campus (mostly talking about the general atmosphere), while highlighting the positive qualities I saw in studying abroad during a student’s first year of university, but I don’t feel as though I’ve treated well enough the topic of the program itself.

Apart from my liberal studies and Steinhardt requirements, I haven’t taken any English-taught courses at the campus. With that said, though, there have been several opportunities during my time here in which I’ve been able to listen in on Christina Von Koehler’s brilliance on the arts and history, whether it be during our freshman “orientation” (I put this in quotations since we didn’t have a traditional or “real” orientation), overnight trips, or at the gardens of Versailles. While recanting facts isn’t a particular accomplishment or talent to commend, it is her manner of capturing the audience with enthusiasm that certainly warrants the recognition. And if my words alone don’t suffice as proof, I do believe that the Facebook group titled, “Thanks to Christina von Koehler I am an exponentially better human being,” certainly does. After all, the description reads:

Let’s be honest, if you have ever met Christina von Koehler, you are are a better person for the experience. This applies if you have:
1. Taken her classes
2. Been on a tour/field trip
3. Gone to an opera or ballet
4. Seen a presentation (which most likely included Audrey Hepburn or Bugs Bunny)

Moving on, the French counterpart to Christina Von Koehler’s class “Paris through its museums and monuments” class is taught by Catherine Clot, who is as equally great. Meeting five times a week during the hot Parisian summer is a difficult feat, especially when you have to keep students interested during lectures in the overly warm salle 6, and at museums and in Paris’ various neighbourhoods. Like mentioned about Christina Von Koehler, enthusiasm and passion is key, which is what Catherine Clot possesses, emphatically announcing key points and sharing her knowledge on many well-known and some lesser known artworks. That kind of passion sticks to you; it’s two years later and I can walk into the museums and quartiers we visited, and recite the important facts with the same enthusiasm as my professor years before. That and I find myself wandering into new museums when I notice an exhibit relating to something that I had learned about (e.g. Courbet at the MNAC in Barcelona). Not to mention, she is one incredibly compassionate professor; understanding that my French was incredibly far from being perfect, and that nerves can get to me quite easily (especially in a foreign language), I was given some second chances when it came to the final project – both for essay and presentation – so as to improve and better convey what I knew on my exposé topic, and not embarrassingly fail.

When I came back for my junior year, I loaded up my schedule with the the French major course requirements, and it is perhaps only through that route was I able to meet some of the most terrific professors on the campus. I use the superlative so as to express the fact that these are the ones who not only are incredibly knowledgeable about their fields, like Catherine Clot and Christina Von Koehler, but also push you to try and succeed in the French language (the other two don’t concentrate on that so much, more so the communication of their passion for the arts and history).

If you take a literature course, you’ll probably wind up with Philippe Boyer as your professor. Although he may talk awfully quick at times, and it may take several classes to get used to his mannerism of talking, the man definitely knows his French literature. When dissecting the assigned novel for the week, he picks out all of the small nuances that you may not have noticed and strings them together so easily so as to illustrate the author’s genius that you may wonder as to how you couldn’t have picked up on it. And while literature analysis is important, Philippe Boyer certainly doesn’t forget the importance of context, and properly situates each work, so you end up walking away having read some great works, as well as having a fair idea of French history.

advanced conversation spring 2011 A Note on NYU in France

Patrick Guédon asked to have a group picture with our spring 2011 advanced conversation class (image courtesy of Patrick Guédon)

It was through Philippe Boyer, though, that I met Patrick Guédon. While he’s been at the school for ten years, I only had the opportunity to really get to know him this year. You see, I was advised to see Patrick for my French writing after Philippe Boyer noted that he couldn’t understand anything I’ve written and after Christelle Taraud scrawled a B- on my first paper for her. So with that said, I don’t think any professor has actually tried that hard to help me improve myself – he spent time with me during tutorat hours at least once or twice a week to correct my work, which in itself was a feat what with my convoluted thought process. To add, there were the moments in which Patrick tried to inspire some spark in me to absorb more of the French culture and language. Recalling an anecdote, with Patrick’s telling me to talk more with French people, I interpreted it as the following: while my friends left for spring break in the first week, I decided to head onto OkCupid (online dating) and set up three dates during the week with native French speakers so as to fulfill this speaking-more-French obligation. And no, nothing went anywhere with these dates.

And if you want to add the two cents of the French department, in talking with Henriette Goldwyn, she explicitly stated that the tutorat was certainly not like that at the Washington Square campus, the tutorat was merely for homework help from the graduate students, not writing improvement, and that Patrick was merely doing me a favour. Somehow that only seems to reinforce what I have to say in the following paragraphs.

On another note, admittedly Christelle Taraud is a tough professor, but a lot of the time, those are perhaps the best people from whom to learn. I took her course (on feminism) for another second semester simply because I wanted to prove myself, not particularly because I was interested in the topic – that I was better than the work that I had produced in the first semester (on French-African relations). It is through the returned assignments that greatly aided my development in my French language skills. Each text commentary is marked up with grammatical changes, as well as noted with needs for clarification or contextualization. Taking the time to do so for each student, admittedly, easily consumes a whole weekend, so it is really to our own benefit that she does this. And for the record, my writing has definitely gotten better – at least some of what I write, as opposed to none, is comprehensible

With all of that said about the professors mentioned above, you can probably see why I enjoyed the academic program here so much. It is an incredibly nurturing environment, in terms of language and the arts. To be honest, I was never meant to be a French major, and probably still not (which makes some laugh when I say I am writing an honours thesis for the department) even after taking all of these courses here, but I do like learning. I enjoy accumulating cultural knowledge and learning in a very conducive environment, such as this one, which is perhaps one of the many reasons why I had stayed the whole year. Pretty much everyone here is approachable and available – something that you may not be able to find at your regular CAS department.

nyu france chairs A Note on NYU in France

Chairs and tables to eat lunch and chat during the breaks

It’s rather difficult to qualify my perceptions of the administrative staff since my interaction is so much more limited with them than with my (former) professors. With that said, I will gladly dispute this past semester’s reviews of the student life office, which are for the large part, negative (don’t ask how I know). I’ve seen the staff changes in the student life office over the past two years – much of the people you see now upstairs, such as Raissa Lahcine, Morwena L’Henoret, and Melanie Satterwhite used to work in the office before moving onto more administrative things, or simply into their own offices. Those three, along with Bryan Pirolli, did a great job in planning activities and trips when I was a freshman, so I was just as excited when I came back for my junior year to see what the new staff, Laura Tallent, Ivy Vo, and Heather Simon, were capable of. I think, for those three having been students through the program, they have a better understanding of what it is we want in terms of trips, whether it be more free time to explore the city, or excursions that interest us (such as the beer factories in Strasbourg and Lille).

In terms of day-to-day activities at the office, they’ve always been helpful and quick to respond by email, even when busy or making deadlines for OFII forms or wrestling with Albert. I’m not entirely sure what the negative reviews could have to complain about, aside from the fact that those who do work in the office are human and have lives outside of the university (though that may be hard to believe with some of them staying past 20h00, not counting guest speaker nights). Albeit, they may not know everything visa- or France-related, but no one does, especially when one is coming fresh into the position. But hey, they try their best with a smile, what more could you ask for?

There are probably some negative things that I could say about the program and campus, but there is no real point in doing so, as they are only slightly irksome (that and I did mention it a while back). When you spend two years on such a small campus, it is so much better to focus on the positive aspects of it, which include a great administrative staff and faculty, along with a nurturing academic program. After all, had it been that negative an experience, why would I have bothered with more than a year (or for others, a semester)?

nyu france hall A Note on NYU in France

Entering the campus

nyu france courtyard campus A Note on NYU in France

Leading up to the 'Petite Maison'

nyu france petite maison A Note on NYU in France

The 'Petite Maison' was a fall 2008 expansion to the campus, in part to accommodate the influx of students to the program, including the pilot freshman year abroad program at NYU in France

nyu france petite maison staircase A Note on NYU in France

Staircase of the 'Petite Maison'

May 17, 2011